Should the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a possibility to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is often only finished Should the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence plus the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were very well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to generally be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Little fees implement.
Should the DIGP finds evidence of the cognizable offense by either party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and carry on according for the regulation. This petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Read more
Also, it may review an appeal of a decision for which it's granted certification. In addition to its legal authority, the Court holds limited political authority. It will review and finalize a decision by The brand new Jersey Redistricting Commission on redistricting congressional districts Should the Commission cannot attain a decision.
2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance dealing with departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, they are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. twelve. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD twelve Justice of your Peace u/s 22-A isn't obliged to afford an opportunity of hearing to the accused party; nor obliged to essentially or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is necessary to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid equipment of criminal regulation from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are a lot of the relevant factors. Read more
Many judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not represent a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in positioning the Petitioner's name on the ECL based on the criminal case are inconsistent with founded legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more
Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common law, is really a legislation that is based on precedents, that may be the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than law based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether These remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
182 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi So far as the stance with the respondents that pensionary benefits may be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 of your Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does provide for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These contain if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension may very well be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could possibly be withheld or reduced. In certain cases, a civil servant's pension might be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set because of the government.
If granted absolute read more immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.
Because the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be reached, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Summaries give a condensed overview of offences and their penalties, and the procedural aspects of prosecuting and punishing individuals accused of committing crimes.
Comments on “case law air 1964 ker 277 - An Overview”